Strategies
Improve Early Grade-Level Reading
Improve Access to Child Care
Market forces alone cannot ensure the availability of high-quality, affordable care for low-income families in their own communities. [1] Poor and rural areas are less likely to have an adequate supply of licensed care. [2] Child care subsidy and licensing policies are two critical levers to improve the quality and supply of care for low-income families. Supply and quality are especially critical to at-risk children, and policies can make sure that children at highest risk (children known to the child welfare system, special health care needs, developmental delays, exposure to HIV/AIDS or drugs, etc.) are given priority for enrollment in early care and education opportunities. These children need early opportunities and their families are least likely to enroll them without assistance.
What Can Policymakers Do?
-
Guarantee child care assistance to low-income families. Studies show that child care subsidies enable families to access higher quality center-based care, and lessen their dependence on unregulated care. [3] Rhode Island law entitles child care assistance to families at or below 180 percent FPL. There are no waiting lists for subsidies and no time limits on assistance.
-
Set provider reimbursement rates to be at or above the federally recommended 75th percentile of the market rate (measured every 2 years). Below-market rates create a disincentive for providers to accept subsidies when they can earn more from families who will pay the market rate. [4] Rates in Arkansas and Maine in 2007 met 75 percent of 2006 rates. [5]
-
Offer higher reimbursement rates, wage supplements, scholarships, technical assistance, and other resources to promote and reward higher quality.Oklahoma is one of several states to set tiered subsidy reimbursement levels that are linked to successively higher levels of quality. In North Carolina, the Governor successfully championed T.E.A.C.H.® scholarships and the Child Care WAGE$ ® wage supplement program that encourage and reward attainment of higher levels of education and training. [6]Both states also developed a Quality Rating System that assigns a rating (e.g., one to five stars) to communicate a program’s quality level to parents. Washington gave family child care providers serving low-income children access to affordable health insurance through health care benefits .
-
Raise child care licensing standards, increase monitoring, and provide technical assistance opportunities to providers. State program standards vary widely. Evidence is clear that group size and adult: child ratios are important quality factors. More frequent inspections by qualified licensing staff are associated with higher rates of regulatory compliance. North Dakota's standards for child care centers set group size for 4-year-olds at 20 and the adult:child ratio at 1:10; and group size for toddlers at eight and the adult:child ratio at 1:4. Hawaii inspects all licensed child care centers, small family child care homes and large/group family child care homes annually.
[1] Lombardi, J. (2003). Time to Care: Redesigning Child Care to Promote Education, Support Families, and Build Communities. Philadelphia, Pa.: Temple University Press, 2003, 8–9.
[2] Layzer, J.I. and Collins, A.A. (2000). National Study of Low-Income Child Care–State and Community Substudy. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates. Gordon, R.A. and Chase-Lansdale, P.L. (2001). Availability of child care in the United States: A description and analysis of data sources. Demography, 38 (2), 306; Walker, S.K. and Reschke, K.L. (2004). Child Care Use by Low-Income Families in Rural Areas. Journal of Children & Poverty, 10 (2), 149-168; Smith, K. (2006). Rural Families Choose Home-Based Child Care For Their Preschool Aged Children. Carsey Institute, University of New Hampshire. National Association of Child Care Resource and Referral Agencies, Child Care in Thirteen Economically Disadvantaged Communities.
[3] U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Child Care Bureau. Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) Report to Congress, Fiscal Year 2001. (2003, January).
[4] National Center for Children in Poverty. (2007). User Guide to the State Early Childhood Profiles. New York: National Center for Children in Poverty.
[5] Schulman, K. and Blank, H. (2007). State Child Care Assistance Policies 2007: Some Steps Forward, More Progress Needed. Washington: National Women's Law Center.
[6] Child Care Services Association. www.childcareservices.org.