How to Use This Site
Better results for kids and families through research-informed policy

Financing

How Can States Pay for These Strategies?  

 

·         Redeploy existing resources. Reform can be funded through shifts in existing resources.

·          Reorganization. Cook County established home detention by adding youth pre-trial supervision duties to probation staff who supervised post-trial cases.

·         Reinvest savings. Policymakers can shift savings from reduced detention costs to programs or practices that achieve better results. 

·          Research-based strategies. Multnomah County, Ore., used community supervision to close three 16-bed detention units, redirecting $12 million in savings to detention alternatives. [i]

·         Maximize federal funds.  Federal grants available through the Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention (OJJDP) can be used for community-based alternatives and supervision programs.

·          Title II. New Jersey used Title II funds to support JDAI alternatives to detention  [ii]

·          Medicaid.  New Mexico uses Medicaid funds for mental health services to youth in pre-trial detention for up to 60 days. [iii] In 34 states, youth in detention are ineligible based on a misinterpretation of a federal rule.[iv]

·         Leverage private funding.  All JDAI sites have received funds from the Annie E. Casey Foundation. Some sites received grants from the California Endowment to improve health services. Other JDAI sites used Robert Wood Johnson Foundation grants to improve substance abuse services.

·         Invest state general funds.  States fund positions, community services, alternatives to detention and research on detention reforms.


[i] DeMuro, Paul. “ Pathways to Juvenile Detention Reform Series.”Consider the alternatives: Planning and implementing detention alternatives. Baltimore, Md.: Annie E. Casey Foundation,1999.

[ii] http://www.jdaihelpdesk.org/Pages/stateleveldetentionreform.aspx

[iii] Kelly, J. “Medicaid’s buried treasure for juvenile justice: Detention center creates a clinic with money you think you can’t get.” Youth Today, April 1, 2008.  http://youthtoday.org/publication/article.cfm?article_id=1680

[iv] Ten states declared that youth in pre-trial detention are eligible (Colorado, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Utah, Vermont and Wisconsin), five states stated youth in detention were ineligible with some exceptions (Arizona, Hawaii, Idaho, South Carolina, and Virginia), and one state failed to respond (West Virginia).

Money

Maximize Federal Funding. In New Mexico youth in pre-trial detention maintain Medicaid eligibility for up to 60 days. Last year, Medicaid supported $329,000 in mental health services. Those receiving these services had a 33 percent recidivism rate compared to the prior 88 percent rate.[1]

[1] Kelly, J. “Medicaid’s buried treasure for juvenile justice: Detention center creates a clinic with money you think you can’t get.” Youth Today, April 1, 2008.  

Money

Reinvest in What Works. Pennsylvania evaluated seven evidence-based programs serving youth involved in the juvenile justice system that produced a return on investment of between $1 and $25 for every dollar invested. They “represent a potential $317 million return to the Commonwealth.” [i] 

[i] Jones, D.  et al. 2008. The Economic Return on PCCD’s Investment in Research-based Programs:  A Cost-Benefit Assessment of Delinquency Prevention in Pennsylvania.  University Park, Pa.: The Pennsylvania State University.